Different surgical approaches in retropharyngeal lymph nodes dissection in head and neck cancer: a systematic review

Objective: To perform a systematic review of studies analyzing different surgical approaches in the treatment of retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) metastases. Methods: The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the review, for a total of 481 patients (median age: 55.8 years; male: n = 279/393, 70.1%). The success rate by type of approach was 100% (n = 233/233), 93.5% (n = 29/31), 95.7% (n = 67/70), 100% (n = 14/14), 100% (n = 82/82), and 100% (n = 51/51) in the transcervical, endoscopic-assisted transcervical, TORS, transoral, maxillary swing and transmandibular cohorts, respectively. The complication rate by type of ap-proach was 11.2% (n = 26/233), 48.4% (n = 15/31), 48.6% (n = 34/70), 14.3% (n = 2/14), 6.1% (n = 5/82) in the transcervical, endoscopic-assisted transcervical, TORS, transoral and maxillary swing cohorts, respectively. Oncological outcomes were reported by 17 studies (n = 404/481; 84%). Overall, after a median follow-up of 28 months (n = 339/481; IQR 23-40.5), no evidence of disease (NED) was found in 238 patients (58.9%), recurrence at the RPLNs in 14 (3.5%), local recurrence in 22 (5.4%), regional recurrence in 23 (5.7%), locoregional recurrence in 16 (4%), distant metastases in 42 (10.4%), death from disease in 36 (8.9%), death from other cause in 23 (5.7%), and death from unspecified cause in 26 (6.4%). Conclusions: Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to provide direct com-parison between different approaches for RPLNs dissection. (c) 2022 Japanese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.